Blog & Latest Updates
Fly Fishing Articles
Insects by Common Name
> > What's the difference between a riffle and pocket water?
| Greenfish13 | April 28th, 2013, 2:03 am | |
| Posts: 4 | Hello, I am hoping that somebody could explain to me the difference between a riffle and pocket water. I understand that a riffle is the fastest flowing water in a river and runs no deeper than 3 feet and that pocket water is the space behind a rock sticking out of the water. Where does pocket water in a river occur? Can pocket water occur in riffles? When trout occupy a riffle are they necessarily found in pocket water? Any input on this is greatly appreciated, thank you! | |
| Sayfu | April 28th, 2013, 9:45 am | |
| Posts: 560 | The riffle has even current, about the same sized rocks creating the dancing water on top. I can cast my soft hackles and my flyline, and fly will swing evenly through riffle water. And it is not the fastest flowing water. Rapids are where the water flows the fastest. Pocket water is formed in boulder strewn sections with elevation drop exceeding those of say a flat above, or below, and a pocket is identified with slow water below the boulder, and current seams flowing on each side of the boulder. You could have pocket water dispersed throughout a riffle, or rapids. And the boulders do not have to break the surface. I rowed my driftboat through combinations of pocket, and riffle water just the other day, and the boulders that are under the water, but not far enough under to allow you to row over them freely will let you know if they aren't far enough below. | |
| Greenfish13 | April 28th, 2013, 10:06 pm | |
| Posts: 4 | Thank you Sayflu for your help. Can a riffle just be a riffle with water flowing through it? Would there be fish holding in a riffle or would the current be to strong for them that they would instead prefer to be in pocket water or more likely to be in areas closer to the edge of the bank where the current might be slower? I have read that riffle water is considered to be the rapids or are you suggesting that a rapid and a riffle are two different sections of a river? | |
| Sayfu | April 28th, 2013, 10:27 pm | |
| Posts: 560 | Riffle water is not that fast of water. You can easily wade out into riffle water without that much resistance against your body. Riffles are great areas for aquatic insects to inhabit, and crawl amongst the rocks. Fish will hold in deeper water off the end of riffles, and out in deeper water adjacent to riffles, and then feed in the riffles when bugs get active prior to an emergence, and during the emergence. Riffles are generally not regarded as holding water more so as feeding water for trout. On my river, the SF of the Snake, it is common, however, to find big trout holding in shallow water near the bank in riffle water. Osprey overhead often make trout leary of holding in riffle water. | |
| Jesse | April 29th, 2013, 10:27 pm | |
 | Well said by Josh. Depending on whats going on in the river such as temperature and bug activities, will depict whether trout are going to be riffles, runs, pools, etc.. He pretty much summed it up nicely. | |
| Most of us fish our whole lives..not knowing its not the fish that we are after. http://www.filingoflyfishing.com | ||
| Greenfish13 | April 30th, 2013, 8:00 pm | |
| Posts: 4 | Thank you, I appreciate the help from both of you. I will have more questions to post soon. Have a great day! | |
| Adirman | May 1st, 2013, 5:22 pm | |
 Posts: 505 | Is there any criteria for water depth also differentiating a riffle from say, a rapid? Riffles are indeed a bit slower than a rapid in current velocity but are they also necessarily shallower also? | |
| Martinlf | May 2nd, 2013, 8:28 pm | |
 Moderator Palmyra PAPosts: 3233 | I think rapids can be relatively shallow, or deep, depending on many factors such as gradient, stream size, stream width in relation to volume, and that riffles can be relatively deep in relation to some rapids. Essentially, I believe velocity and structure account for the difference, not depth. | |
| "He spread them a yard and a half. 'And every one that got away is this big.'" --Fred Chappell | ||
| Greenfish13 | May 10th, 2013, 8:42 pm | |
| Posts: 4 | would a riffle also b considered a type 1 rapid? | |
| Martinlf | May 10th, 2013, 8:57 pm | |
Moderator Palmyra PAPosts: 3233 | As an old whitewater guide, I'd venture that some class 1 rapids are riffles, while others are not. For whitewater paddlers rapid class has more to do with the danger level than the kinds of things trout fishermen concern themselves with. | |
| "He spread them a yard and a half. 'And every one that got away is this big.'" --Fred Chappell | ||
| PaulRoberts | May 11th, 2013, 12:17 am | |
 Posts: 1776 | Riffles are erosional zones, pools depositional. Each come in many flavors. | |
| Entoman | May 11th, 2013, 12:42 pm | |
 Posts: 2604 | Riffles are erosional zones, pools depositional. Each come in many flavors. Yep... Practically speaking, to me a rapid is a riffle (usually with big boulders scattered) that I wouldn't dare wade except at the margins. Or put the other way - A riffle is a rapid (usually without big boulders scattered) that I am perfectly comfortable with wading to and fro in. Pocket water is a run or riffle with big rocks in it. The latter is shallower and would be "riffley" without the big rocks. The former would be smooth. | |
| "It's not that I find fishing so important, it's just that I find all other endeavors of Man equally unimportant... And not nearly as much fun!" Robert Traver, Anatomy of a Fisherman | ||
| PaulRoberts | May 11th, 2013, 3:29 pm | |
Posts: 1776 | Riffles are erosional zones, pools depositional. Each come in many flavors. I'll agree with that. | |
| Martinlf | May 12th, 2013, 10:45 am | |
Moderator Palmyra PAPosts: 3233 | Me too. Kurt's comment helps to illustrate why whitewater canoe terminology is less useful in reference to trout fishing. Some class 1 rapids can be shallow and easy to wade, while others are very deep, though without considerable danger to those floating through them. Terms such as "riffle," "run," and "pocket water," are much more useful in reference to trout fishing. And in regard to the original question about where trout can be found, as Sayfu and Jesse explain, trout like structure, large and small, where they can find a break from current, protection from predators, etc. Rocks that create pocket water are but one kind of structure found in streams. And, during hatches, trout may move from a holding lie to a feeding lie, if they are not already in a prime lie, so determining where trout can be found in a riffle depends on multiple factors. They often can be found in pocket water, but they can be found other places too, including smoother riffles and runs, under the right conditions. | |
| "He spread them a yard and a half. 'And every one that got away is this big.'" --Fred Chappell | ||
| Gutcutter | May 12th, 2013, 11:48 am | |
 Posts: 470 | ...a rapid is a riffle (usually with big boulders scattered)... Huh? | |
| All men who fish may in turn be divided into two parts: those who fish for trout and those who don't. Trout fishermen are a race apart: they are a dedicated crew- indolent, improvident, and quietly mad. -Robert Traver, Trout Madness | ||
| Sayfu | May 12th, 2013, 12:30 pm | |
| Posts: 560 | Seems like we are in a revolving conundrum as to what a rapid, and a riffle are defined as. A key for fishermen is to know where the fish will lie, and that can be in deeper, faster water with boulder protection on the bottom. Much of that kinda water is not prime fly fishing water unless you are a chuck'n ducker. | |
| PaulRoberts | May 12th, 2013, 2:18 pm | |
Posts: 1776 | A "riffle" is described by water volume and velocity, in turn determined mostly by gradient ("head" is the term for vertical rise/elevation change from point of interest to a given area upstream. Erosional zones sweep away (erode) substrate leaving behind substrate pieces massive enough not to be swept. A "rapid" can most simply be seen as a large riffle. Thus, a rapid tends to contain boulders. Relax this area some in terms of head and you might end up with a stretch that fly-fishers lovingly call "pocket water". For old time's sake, a "rill" is a small erosional zone run dry, which some FF lovingly call streams in miniature which might contain trout but require a sense of adventure and romance to discover (or don't have the gas money to get farther down the watershed). | |
| Entoman | May 12th, 2013, 2:30 pm | |
Posts: 2604 | ...a rapid is a riffle (usually with big boulders scattered)... Jeez, Tony... Why not clip off a few more words to complete the obtuseness?:)LOL ...a rapid is a riffle ... There... Now the job is complete. :) Anyway, like that judge (can't remember his name) when asked how he defined pornography, the easiest and perhaps most accurate response for these questions is probably, "I know it when I see it." :) | |
| "It's not that I find fishing so important, it's just that I find all other endeavors of Man equally unimportant... And not nearly as much fun!" Robert Traver, Anatomy of a Fisherman | ||
| Entoman | May 12th, 2013, 3:09 pm | |
Posts: 2604 | Kurt's comment helps to illustrate why whitewater canoe terminology is less useful in reference to trout fishing. As are the whitewater enthusiasts themselves.:) I mostly stoically ignore them if I can, considering them a hazard of the trade. I do remember one, though... It was on the Truckee, which is as famous for its "raft hatch" as its good fishing. This fella floats through and asks the question one of his species should never ask one of mine, "How's the fishing?" I replied that it looked promising until he stuck his paddle in the face of a nice one I was working for. I said it with a smile on my face but he portaged below me anyway. "Oh boy, here we go.", I thought. I ignored him until he got close enough that to continue so would have been imprudent. As I turned to face him, he was smiling and holding two beers. He unnecessarily apologized as we sat for a minute talking about the vagaries of the river we shared and our seemingly opposed use. He mentioned the frustration of anglers that wouldn't budge from the only easily passable spot, to which I laughingly joked, "That's 'cause we own the river and you guys are trespassers." I thanked him for the beer. He replied that he was portaging for a break anyway and felt it was the least he could do since he "slapped my date." He had long since drifted out of site as I finished the beer. The fish began to work again but was now approached with a much "calmer" demeanor. After releasing him, I took the empty bottle out of my vest rear pocket and raised it in salute while looking downstream. | |
| "It's not that I find fishing so important, it's just that I find all other endeavors of Man equally unimportant... And not nearly as much fun!" Robert Traver, Anatomy of a Fisherman | ||
| PaulRoberts | May 12th, 2013, 3:47 pm | |
Posts: 1776 | Nice, Kurt. | |
Quick Reply
You have to be logged in to post on the forum. It's this easy:
Related Discussions
| Title | Replies | Last Reply |
| Re: new member In General Discussion by Epeirce | 1 | Mar 5, 2008 by Jjlyon01 |
| Yorkshire, River Wharf, on my own this time In Fishing Reports by CaseyP | 0 | |
| Re: Current River (belated report) In Fishing Reports by Motrout | 1 | Sep 25, 2010 by Martinlf |
Suwallia sp.     In the Photography Board by Millcreek | 0 | |
| Two Days on a beautiful river In Fishing Reports by Motrout | 0 | |
Re: Oecetis sp. larvae and pupae     (3 more) In the Identify This! Board by Millcreek | 9 | Jul 7, 2015 by Millcreek |
Re: The Blackfoot River and the North Fork of the Blackfoot     (1 more) In Fishing Reports by Martinlf | 6 | Aug 2, 2021 by Wbranch |
| Re: fish location/holding water In General Discussion by Sayfu | 9 | Sep 30, 2012 by Sayfu |
Montana: The Yellowstone River   In Fishing Reports by Martinlf | 0 | |
| Re: Emerging Isonychia nymph In General Discussion by Troutnut | 2 | Oct 7, 2006 by Troutnut |
Troutnut.com is copyright © 2004-2024 Jason
Neuswanger (email Jason). See my FAQ for information about use of my images.
privacy policy
privacy policy