Troutnut.com Fly Fishing for Trout Home
User Password
or register.
Scientific name search:

> > Pennsylvania Mayfly Spinner



GrannomJuly 22nd, 2008, 11:42 am
Northwest PA

Posts: 87
Any ideas on this one? From NW PA. About a size 18, found around noon today in a spider web on a stream not known for either trout or bugs. I have never seen a substantial hatch of anything on this stream, but today I say these little guys along with some tricos. The stream gets pretty warm and I was fishing for smallies and chubs...yes the little bottom-feeders that everyone hates... Anyway, let me know if you have any ideas.



Mike
"Be calm - you're there..." "...Tell yourself there's no rush, even if there is."

-John Gierach
GONZOJuly 22nd, 2008, 2:11 pm
Site Editor
"Bear Swamp," PA

Posts: 1681
Hard to say for sure without a closer shot, Mike, but they look like little Leucrocuta spinners (male). Leucrocuta is a very underrated hatch at this time of year, even on legitimate trout streams.
WbranchJuly 22nd, 2008, 2:50 pm
York & Starlight PA

Posts: 2733
While no bug guy like many here I'd bet a dozen flies it is a Luekon shuck. (White fly spinner)
Catskill fly fisher for fifty-five years.
TaxonJuly 22nd, 2008, 3:11 pm
Site Editor
Royse City, TX

Posts: 1350
Mike-

I believe your mayfly photo to be of two Maccaffertium pulchellum male imagos.
Best regards,
Roger Rohrbeck
www.FlyfishingEntomology.com
GrannomJuly 22nd, 2008, 4:00 pm
Northwest PA

Posts: 87
I appreciate everyone's input. I don't think that it is Ephoron leukon...these flies were slightly smaller, it's too early in the year and the veination on the wings is different. Also, leukon has 3 tails to my knowledge and both of these flies have only 2. Here is a closer picture of the same fly. Maybe this will help.



Mike
"Be calm - you're there..." "...Tell yourself there's no rush, even if there is."

-John Gierach
GONZOJuly 22nd, 2008, 4:42 pm
Site Editor
"Bear Swamp," PA

Posts: 1681
Wbranch,

E. leukon would be larger, the wings (even of the male spinners) retain a milky appearance and are unmarked except for a dark leading edge (no very dark cross-veins), the legs (except for the forelegs of male spinners) are atrophied and small, and the eyes are smaller and dark. (The eyes of heptageniids fluoresce in bright light.) Compare to John's photos:

http://www.wiflyfisher.com/ephoron-leukon-mayfly-hatch.asp

Roger,

It does appear to be a heptageniid, and I considered Maccaffertium and Stenacron, but they are all larger than a standard #18 (which I take to be about 6-7mm). Leucrocuta and a few Nixe or Heptagenia are in that size range. Also it seems that the darkened cluster of cross-veins are in the first space behind the costa, whereas Maccaffertium, Stenonema, and Stenacron tend to have clustered cross-veins or dark marks in the third space. I don't have examples of the other Leucrocuta (I believe that aphrodite and juno are lighter in color), but you can see the translucent abdomen on the darker hebe in Don Chandler's photo:

http://bugguide.net/node/view/203347/bgimage
TaxonJuly 22nd, 2008, 5:00 pm
Site Editor
Royse City, TX

Posts: 1350
Lloyd-

Oops. Didn't notice that Mike mentioned a size. Guess I need to read better and analyze less.
Best regards,
Roger Rohrbeck
www.FlyfishingEntomology.com
GrannomJuly 22nd, 2008, 5:02 pm
Northwest PA

Posts: 87
Lets leave it at Leucrocuta for now. The stream is right down the street and I'll be fishing it all summer. I will take more and hopefully better pictures in the future and we'll see if we can't narrow it down.

Gonzo- I was not able to find photos of L. juno or L. aphrodite. Please do let me know if anything else comes up. Thanks

Mike
"Be calm - you're there..." "...Tell yourself there's no rush, even if there is."

-John Gierach
GONZOJuly 22nd, 2008, 5:04 pm
Site Editor
"Bear Swamp," PA

Posts: 1681
Quite alright, Roger, since a heptageniid ID is about all that's fairly certain, I'll split the dozen flies with you. ;)
GrannomJuly 22nd, 2008, 5:07 pm
Northwest PA

Posts: 87
NOTICE- I have made a huge mistake. This fly is NOT a size 18. It is clearly 16, if not slightly larger. I just guessed earlier, but now looking at some hooks, I would put it at a size 16. I am sorry guys. Well let me know what we may be looking at now.
"Be calm - you're there..." "...Tell yourself there's no rush, even if there is."

-John Gierach
GONZOJuly 22nd, 2008, 5:10 pm
Site Editor
"Bear Swamp," PA

Posts: 1681
Well, that puts it nearer the borderline. If you can get a close-up of the wing, it should help to resolve any question about the genus in Heptageniidae.
GrannomJuly 22nd, 2008, 5:14 pm
Northwest PA

Posts: 87
This is a horrible photo. It may or may not be helpful.



Mike
"Be calm - you're there..." "...Tell yourself there's no rush, even if there is."

-John Gierach
GONZOJuly 22nd, 2008, 5:52 pm
Site Editor
"Bear Swamp," PA

Posts: 1681
I think it will take a clear shot of the wing (and maybe of the markings on the back) to really be able to pin it down. If it was a large #16 (say, 8-9mm), it would start to be in range for some smaller Maccaffertium or Stenacron males. If that dark blob near the leading edge of the forewing resolves into a hashmark in the third space, it would be a Stenacron something like this one:

http://bugguide.net/node/view/203191/bgimage

If it resolves into dark cross-veins in the first space, it's still probably Leucrocuta. If the cross-veins are clustered more in the second and third space, it could be Maccaffertium.

By the way, Mark, you are quite right about the three tails on Ephoron females--they never molt into spinners and mate as duns. However, the Ephoron males (the ones with the long forelegs in John's photo) do molt and have two tails.

WbranchJuly 23rd, 2008, 1:56 am
York & Starlight PA

Posts: 2733
I too didn't pay attention to the size mentioned in the initial post.
Catskill fly fisher for fifty-five years.
GONZOJuly 26th, 2008, 2:18 pm
Site Editor
"Bear Swamp," PA

Posts: 1681
Since the size range has been revised upwards, I'm now leaning more toward a Maccaffertium ID on this one. I don't think it is pulchellum, though. Descriptions of that species mention that the mesoscutellum is entirely white. It could be modestum, mediopunctatum, or terminatum. These "cream cahills" are very difficult to separate. A clear photo and millimeter measurement might help, but given the variability (especially of modestum) it would still be difficult to be sure.
TaxonJuly 26th, 2008, 4:16 pm
Site Editor
Royse City, TX

Posts: 1350
Lloyd-

Since the size range has been revised upwards, I'm now leaning more toward a Maccaffertium ID on this one. I don't think it is pulchellum, though.


Hmmm. Be cautious with such a posture. Leaning just a bit too far risks tipping over.
Best regards,
Roger Rohrbeck
www.FlyfishingEntomology.com
GONZOJuly 26th, 2008, 4:29 pm
Site Editor
"Bear Swamp," PA

Posts: 1681
You're probably right about the precarious posture, Roger, but teetering on the brink is a habit of mine. :)

Quick Reply

You have to be logged in to post on the forum. It's this easy:
Username:          Email:

Password:    Confirm Password:

I am at least 13 years old and agree to the rules.

Related Discussions

TitleRepliesLast Reply
Not Stenacron, probably Leucrocuta
In Male Leucrocuta hebe Mayfly Spinner by GONZO
0
Re: Peculiar Heptageniid
In Female Epeorus vitreus Mayfly Spinner by Troutnut
2Oct 5, 2006
by GONZO
subnotatus?
In Male Ameletus oregonensis Mayfly Spinner by GONZO
0
Re: Leucrocuta
In Male Leucrocuta hebe Mayfly Spinner by Patrick
1Aug 7, 2006
by Troutnut
Re: Coffin Fly Spinner
In Male Ephemera simulans Mayfly Spinner by Jackson
6Jun 10, 2009
by Martinlf
Re: Delaware
In by Jesse
2Jun 30, 2011
by JOHNW
Re: Perlid identification assistance request
In the Identify This! Board by Tsali
9Jun 17, 2015
by Oldredbarn
Re: Interesting clinger species
In the Identify This! Board by CalebBoyle
7Mar 31, 2007
by GONZO
Re: Pale Gray/White Spinner
In General Discussion by WBMike
6Sep 11, 2015
by Crepuscular
Re: Size Variation in March Browns
In the Identify This! Board by Fishskicano
5May 20, 2009
by GONZO